govdirt's blog

What's REALLY happening between Russia and the U.S.

Putin's Ruthless Gambit

The Bush Administration Falters in a Geopolitical Chess Match

By Michael T. Klare

Many Western analysts have chosen to interpret the recent fighting in the Caucasus as the onset of a new Cold War, with a small pro-Western democracy bravely resisting a brutal reincarnation of Stalin's jack-booted Soviet Union.
Others have viewed it a throwback to the age-old ethnic politics of southeastern Europe, with assorted minorities using contemporary border disputes to settle ancient scores.

Neither of these explanations is accurate. To fully grasp the recent upheavals in the Caucasus, it is necessary to view the conflict as but a minor skirmish in a far more significant geopolitical struggle between Moscow and Washington over the energy riches of the Caspian Sea basin -- with former Russian President (now Prime Minister) Vladimir Putin emerging as the reigning Grand Master of geostrategic chess and the Bush team turning out to be middling amateurs, at best.

The ultimate prize in this contest is control over the flow of oil and natural gas from the energy-rich Caspian basin to eager markets in Europe and Asia. According to the most recent tally by oil giant BP, the Caspian's leading energy producers, all former "socialist republics" of the Soviet Union -- notably Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan -- together possess approximately 48 billion barrels in proven
oil reserves (roughly equivalent to those left in the U.S. and Canada) and 268 trillion cubic feet of natural gas (essentially equivalent to what Saudi Arabia possesses).

Saudi Arabia Spent $75 Billion to Spread Shariah-Type of Islam

Our Petro-Dollars at Work

What do you think of Sarah Palin as VP?

We solicited opinions on Sarah Palin as Vice President and we received a boatload of emails (and one photo) ... As usual we like to look at all sides of an issue (and have fun doing it) instead of towing a particular line. We were going to write an article, but the comments were so interesting that we thought we would share them instead. Thanks everyone! So, what are your thoughts on Sarah Palin?

"While it is quite a shock that Republicans would nominate a woman for VP, I think that even the _nomination_ is good for all women in the same way that blacks are reacting to Obama's nomination - "anything is possible for me". The best VP McCain could have nominated would have been Clinton... Hillary Clinton. That would have brought him not only Republican votes but her supporters as well. I don't think we'll ever see that much cooperation between high-level Republicans & Democrats (have you ever seen the movie "My Fellow Americans"?).

Yes, I am concerned about her experience, or more precisely, her lack thereof. She has governed a state, yes, but that state has a population about 1/4 the size of the city of Chicago and she's only been at it 2 years. Before that, she was mayor of a tiny town. I think she's in way over her head and I don't want the country to suffer for it. I even saw her in a news
clip asking what the duties of the VP are! And if she can't manage her own children, how can she think to manage the politicians in DC?

Krysta Sutterfield"


"I think it's interesting that McCain chose Palin as VP. From what I understand based on the many news reports in the past few days about her minimal political past and lack of previous disclosures, it's impossible to believe that she was picked with much thought other than to just shake things up and that it is also, more than partially, an attempt to win over some of Hillary Clinton's supporters.

The GOP's Shameless Hypocrisy Of Palin Veep Pick

Maybe the most remarkable thing about John McCain's (R) choice of the woefully inexperienced Sarah Palin (R) to be a heartbeat away from the oldest man who would ever be elected to the presidency, and a three-time cancer survivor, is the truly shameless hypocrisy of Republicans over this pick.

It might be instructive to recall what many of these GOP leaders -- who are now praising Palin's complete lack of national and foreign policy experience -- said in 2004 when they blasted John Kerry (D) for picking John Edwards (D) as his running mate.

Despite nearly six years in the United States Senate, these same Republicans ridiculed Edwards as being "too inexperienced" to be a heartbeat away (even as the number two to a very fit and healthy Kerry).

Here are some examples.

Mitt Romney (Washington Times, July 15, 2004):

He doesn't personally dislike Mr. Kerry: "I find him to be a personable fellow," Mr. Romney told me in a recent interview. But Mr. Kerry is too liberal, he says, as is his boyish-looking running mate, John Edwards. Mr. Romney says the North Carolina freshman senator is too inexperienced to be vice president - let alone only an incident away from the presidency.

President Bush (Washington Times, July 8, 2004):

President Bush yesterday criticized Sen. John Edwards for blocking his judicial nominations and bluntly dismissed the one-term North Carolina Democrat as too inexperienced to be a heartbeat away from the presidency.

What is it exactly that a VP does?

Colbert: The Repo Man Is Gonna Miss Bush

On last night's Colbert Report, Stephen cut through all of the doom and gloom of the Democratic Convention by profiling someone who's flourishing in the current economy: A repo man.

Others who are probably doing well these days include unemployment-office workers, squatters, pan-handle makers, trashcan-fire emporiums, tumble-weed manufacturers and super-villains.

Looks Like The Party Has Started...

... and we are all invited! But how did Hillary get in the front seat?

Syndicate content